Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Stern

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1978Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Frank R. Bayger, J.

By these proceedings under CPLR article 78, petitioners seek to contest the legality of the respondent authorities’ investigation and prosecution of three unnamed Town Justices for alleged misconduct in the performance of their judicial duties. Subsequent to the commencement of these actions, formal charges were preferred by the Court on the Judiciary upon recommendation of the respondent commission. The Justices referred to in the first action were thereupon identified as Norman E. Kuehnel and Thomas H. Rosinski of the Town of Hamburg, New York. Justice…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. MATTER OF STATE OF NY v. KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. La Rocca v. LaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Lee v. County Ct. of Erie CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. People v. GoodmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Nigrone v. MurtaghNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API