Legal Opinion

Nigrone v. Murtagh

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1975PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge Breitel.

Once again, in a little over two months, this court is presented with the issue whether a collateral and extraordinary proceeding in the nature of prohibition under CPLR article 78 should be entertained to review allegedly gross error or defect in a pending criminal action. In this instance the gross error or defect has been caused by alleged prosecutorial misconduct, in simulating the setting for criminal actions for perjury now pending against petitioner and two others. And, once again, the answer should be, whatever the provocation to do otherwise, orderly procedure…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. MATTER OF STATE OF NY v. KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Lee v. County Ct. of Erie CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Proskin v. County Court of Albany CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Hogan v. CulkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. People v. RinaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Holtzman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. La Rocca v. LaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Dondi v. JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Steingut v. GoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. State v. WolowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API