Legal Opinion

United States v. Marc Griffith

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 10, 1989No. 88-5282PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOGGS, Circuit Judge.

While trespassing on the Fort Campbell Military Reservation, an area of exclusive federal jurisdiction, Griffith shot a fellow hunter. He was indicted for violating the Assimilative Crimes Act (ACA), based on his violation of a Tennessee law that forbids a person from “causing serious bodily injury ... recklessly under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life.” Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-2-101 (Supp.1988). The indictment was dismissed on the ground that the federal assault statute, 18 U.S.C. § 113(c), 1 was sufficiently similar to the Tennessee…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. NarcisoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977
  3. United States v. Gennie Lynn BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. Darelle Dean ButlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. Seth Henry Big CrowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  2. United States v. Wallace Johnson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. James M. Lewis Debra Faye LewisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. LewisDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1994
  5. United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API