Legal Opinion
Pillsbury Co. v. Southard
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Decided April 6, 1987No. 85-144-CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION
SEAY, Chief Judge.
This matter was heard by a jury on April 18, 21, 22, and 23, 1986, in proceedings in which all parties appeared and were represented by counsel. On April 23, 1986, the matter of liability was submitted to the jury through seven special interrogatories and the jury returned its verdict favorable to plaintiff on those special interrogatories.
The court concludes from its review of the evidence and from the jury verdict that the plaintiff is entitled to a permanent injunction relating to defendants' use of the mark Hungry Jack’s and confusingly…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The W. E. Bassett Company v. Revlon, Inc., the W. E. Bassett Company v. Revlon, Inc., (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Maltina Corporation and Julio Blanco-Herrera v. Cawy Bottling Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Sammons v. Colonial Press, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1942
- Boston Professional Hockey Association, Inc., Cross-Appellants v. Dallas Cap & Emblem Manufacturing, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Blue Bell Co. v. Frontier Refining Co. Frontier Refining Co. v. Blue Bell Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tiramisu Intertional LLC v. Clever Imports LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
- American Express Co. v. American Express Limousine Service Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1992