American Express Co. v. American Express Limousine Service Ltd.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WEXLER, District Judge.
On September 23, 1991, this Court granted summary judgment to the American Express Company (“American Express” or “plaintiff”) in the above-referenced action against American Express Limousine Service (“AELS”) and its owners Ralph Can-tone and Donald Barfield (collectively “defendants”) for defendants’ use of plaintiffs trade names in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114(1) and 1125(a) and New York General Business Law § 368-d. In that Order, defendants were enjoined from further use of the trade names AMERICAN EXPRESS and AMEX and were…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Grotrian, Helfferich, Schulz, Th. Steinweg Nachf. v. Steinway & SonsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- The W. E. Bassett Company v. Revlon, Inc., the W. E. Bassett Company v. Revlon, Inc., (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Manhattan Industries, Inc. v. Sweater Bee by Banff, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- American Honda Motor Co., Inc. v. Two Wheel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Getty Petroleum Corp. v. Bartco Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- New York State Society of Certified Public Accountants v. Eric Louis Associates, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999