Legal Opinion

Hagemann-Mullen Excavating Co. v. Fenlon

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 1984No. 47488PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARD, Judge.

Plaintiff filed a three count petition against Joseph A. Fenlon, his wife and five other defendants. The Fenlons filed a motion to dismiss Count I and a motion to make Counts II and III more definite and certain. The remaining defendants filed answers to the petition. The trial court granted the Fenlons’ motion to dismiss as to Count I and denied their motion to make more definite and certain. Plaintiff has appealed the dismissal of Count I.

Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because the notice of appeal was untimely filed. We agree the appeal should be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Citizens Insurance Co. of New Jersey v. Kansas City Commercial Cartage, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Reeves v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McClellan v. Barrath Const. Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Harris v. Union Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Boatmen's First National Bank of West Plains v. Southern Missouri District Council of Assemblies of GodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Leve v. DelphMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API