National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEDINA, Circuit Judge.
In order to shield “unoffending employers and others from pressures in controversies not their own”, N. L. R. B. v. Denver Building & Construction Trades Council, 1951, 341 U.S. 675, 692, 71 S.Ct. 943, 953, 95 L.Ed. 1284, the Taft-Hartley Act makes it an unfair labor practice for a union to engage in a secondary boycott. In the language of the statute, Section 8(b)(4) (A) and (B), 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(b)(4) (A) and (B), it is such an unfair labor practice for a labor organization “to induce or encourage the employees of any employer to engage in * * * a concerted refusal in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Rabouin v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Madden v. Local 442, International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1953
3Cited by1 opinion
- National Labor Relations Board v. International BrotherhoodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955