Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Raritan Valley Disposal

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 14, 2008PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

SKILLMAN, P.J.A.D.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether an insured that has had all costs of defense and settlement of a claim paid by one insurer may pursue a coverage action against a second insurer even though the first insurer would be subrogated to any recovery from the second insurer. We conclude that an insured lacks standing to maintain a coverage action under such circumstances and that the first insurer’s claim for contribution against the second insurer is the only coverage claim that survives the settlement. We also conclude that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  3. New Jersey State Chamber of Commerce v. New Jersey Election Law Enforcement CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  4. Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  5. Luxliner P.L. Export, Co. v. RDI/Luxliner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bank of New York v. RaftogianisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
  2. Bondi v. Citigroup, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
  3. Cargill, Inc. v. Ace American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. COURIER-POST v. County of CamdenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
  5. Potomac Ins. v. Pennsylvania Mfrs.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API