Legal Opinion
Roth v. Turoff
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 3, 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Herbert Shapiro, J.
In this CPLR article 78 proceeding the petitioner, an attorney-at-law, seeks, in effect, a determination that duly admitted attorneys are exempt from the rules and regulations governing “Taxi Brokers” promulgated by the respondent, New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission (Commission) pursuant to Local Laws, 1984, No. 18 of City of New York.
In April 1984 the City Council of the City of New York (Council) enacted a law which added Administrative Code of the City of New York § 2325. That section, in substance, defined “taxicab broker” and provided for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Eaton v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- A. E. Nettleton Co. v. DiamondNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Rosenthal v. HartnettNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by4 opinions
- Eric M. Berman, P.C. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Eric M. Berman, P.C. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Berman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
- Eric M. Berman, P.C. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014