Legal Opinion
Heinold Commodities, Inc. v. New York Mercantile Exchange
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 27, 1978No. 76 Civ. 3905 (LFM)Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MacMAHON, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves for leave to amend its complaint. Rule 15(a), Fed.R.Civ.P.
Plaintiff commenced this action on September 1, 1976, alleging that defendants had fraudulently manipulated the price of Maine potato futures. The suit, which sought only injunctive and declaratory relief, was consolidated with numerous related actions seeking both equitable relief and damages. Discovery in the consolidated actions has been proceeding under the supervision of a Special Master. Plaintiff now seeks to . amend its complaint to recover from defendant Hornblower &…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Freeman v. Bee MacHine Co., IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Middle Atlantic Utilities Co. v. S. M. W. Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- American Electric Power Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Green v. Wolf Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.