Legal Opinion
Antonio Smith v. State of Indiana
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided June 26, 2015No. 71S04-1506-CR-364PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DICKSON, Justice.
Following a jury trial, defendant Antonio Smith was convicted of Burglary, a Class C felony, committed at a Dollar General store in South Bend, Indiana. On appeal, the defendant seeks reversal of his conviction, asserting (1) the State knowingly used perjured testimony and (2) the testimony of the principal state witness was incredibly dubious, leaving insufficient evidence to sustain the conviction. The Court of Appeals reversed, finding the conviction was obtained through the State’s knowing use of perjured testimony. Smith v. State, 22 N.E.3d 620, 628 (Ind.Ct.App.2014). We…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Pyle v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Miller v. PateSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Jabreeh Cash Davis-Martin v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
- Anthony G. Boyer v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Austin Howard Keever v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
- Benjamin C. Taylor v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2024
- David E. Proffitt v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.