People v. New York Carbonic Acid Gas Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal in each of the first three above-entitled actions from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered September 28, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Read the full summary
Appeal in each of the first three above-entitled actions from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered September 28, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term. Appeal in the fourth above-entitled action from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered October G, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term. These actions were brought to have the…
1Opinion of the CourtGeay, J.
It is difficult to understand upon what ground the evidence offered by these defendants was excluded; unless it .be the interpretation given to our decision of the case of Hathorn v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., (194 N. Y. 326). Ho opinion appears to have been expressed below and I think we must presume it to have been considered that the statute, which authorized the plaintiff to maintain the actions, (Laws of 1908, chap. 429), as construed by this court, abso lately prohibited the pumping of the mineral waters in question, as practiced by the defendants in the conduct of their particular…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ohio Oil Company v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Wynehamer v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Bertholf v. . O'ReillyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- People v. . BallardNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- People Ex Rel. New York Electric Lines Co. v. SquireNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- State v. Michels Pipeline Construction, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Schenk v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Washington v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Kings County Lighting Co. v. MaltbieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.