In re Wolf
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, New York county. Petition by Max Wolf for an order directing the payment to him by Charles P. Crosby, an attorney at law, of certain moneys received by the latter. The application was referred, the report of the referee confirmed, and the order granted. Crosby appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDaniels, J.
It appeared in support of the application for the order that an action had been prosecuted in the city court of Brooklyn by Max Wolf, the applicant, against Henry Elias, for a malicious prosecution. In that action the petitioner recovered a judgment for $1,000 damages and $145.63 costs. This action was commenced on the 23d of April, 1881, and the law firm of Daily & Crosby were the attorneys and counsel of the petitioner in the action. The appellant Charles P. Crosby was a member of this firm, which was formed on the 1st of February, 1880, and it was agreed between the partners in their…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re PaschalSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- In the Matter of the Application of KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- McMahon v. . the New York and Erie Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Bowling Green Savings Bank v. . ToddNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- In the Matter of H____, an AttorneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commercial Telegram Co. v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1890
- Howitt v. MerrillNew York Court of Appeals · 1889