Legal Opinion

Mine & Smelter Supply Co. v. Stock Growers' Bank

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 21, 1912No. 3,641PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Wyoming; John A. Riner, Judge. ( Action by the Mine & Smelter Supply Company against the Stock Growers’ Bank. Judgment for defendant, and' plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

CARLAND, Circuit Judge.

This case was here once before on demurrer to the complaint. Mine & Smelter Supply Co. v. Stock Growers’ Bank, 173 Fed. 859, 98 C. C. A. 229. The case having been remanded for proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this court, it was moved for trial upon the second cause of action stated in the complaint. This cause of action declared upon a cashier’s check executed and delivéred to the supply company by the bank November 9, 1906, for the sum of $5,870,74. The answer of the bank admitted the execution and delivery of the check, but alleged that the issuance of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mine & Smelter Supply Co. v. Stockgrowers' BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. Curtiss National Bank of Miami SpringsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  2. Farmers & Merchants State Bank, an Idaho Banking Corporation v. Western Bank, an Oregon Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Dionisio Sainz Gonzalez v. Banco De Santander-Puerto Rico, Dionisio Sainz Gonzalez v. Banco De Santander-Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  4. State of Pennsylvania, by and Through Paul Silverstein, as Special Deputy Insurance Commissioner v. Curtiss National Bank of Miami Springs, Florida, Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. National Western Life Insurance Company, Third Party Defendants-Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API