Legal Opinion
United States v. Christopher Bour
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 27, 2015No. 14-2211, 15-1090PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANION, Circuit Judge.
Christopher Bour paid a woman named Natisha for permission to molest, rape, and create pornographic films of her infant daughter — and, not content with these crimes, he also took explicit photographs of Natisha’s four-to-five-year-old daughter. After Bour invited a woman called TJ to watch him “play with” the littlest girl, TJ informed the FBI and a criminal investigation launched. Bour pleaded guilty on five counts, while Natisha was separately sentenced for her role in this grisly treatment of her daughters. Bour now challenges his sentence, supervised-release…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lawrence v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Pepper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. Parrish KappesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Ladonta GillCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Antwon JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Lloyd RoblCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- United States v. CairaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Kobe HendrixCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.