Simon v. Goodman
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The question presented by the appeal is the giving at defendant’s request the general affirmative charge as to the wanton count.
There are many decisions by this court, touching the question presented for decision, not necessary to cite. Typical cases of wantonness, supported by a scintilla of evidence are: Lambert v. Birmingham Electric Co., ante, p. 333, 13 So.2d 579; Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. Jung, 161 Ala. 461, 475, 49 So. 434, 18 Ann.Cas. 557; Birmingham Electric Co. v. Mann, 226 Ala. 379, 147 So. 165; Dozier v. Woods, 190 Ala. 279, 67 So. 283; Duke v.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Godfrey v. VinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Duke v. GainesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Birmingham Electric Co. v. MannSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Feore v. TrammelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Birmingham Railway L. & P. Co. v. JungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Blount Brothers Construction Company v. RoseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
- Hamilton v. BrowningSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Taylor v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- McNickle v. StriplingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Wilhite v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.