Komalty v. Cassidy-Southwest Commission Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court. Caddo County; Frank Matthews, Assigned Judge. Action by Harry Komalty against the Cas-sidy-Southwest Commission Company and others. There was a judgment for defendants, and plaintiff .brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
CLARK, C.
This is an action in ejectment, brought by Harry Komalty against several hundred defendants, to recover an undivided one-third interest in and to the southwest quarter of section 6, township 7, range 13 west, in Caddo county (being the land upon which the town of Carnegie is now situate).
The plaintiff claims that he and two other Indians, named Adle-gam-ah and Duke-Poor-Buffalo, were the true and only heirs at law of one Pau-tautle-ty, a deceased Kiowa Indian, to whom an allotment of the land was made, and on August 25, 1901, a patent issued. Further allegations of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chickasha Light, Heat & Power Co. v. BezdicheckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Grounds v. DingmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Keet & Roundtree Dry Goods Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Adams v. HigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
3Cited by1 opinion
- Berg v. WillibeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929