Rosenthal v. Davenport
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiffs from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, refusing a new trial. The action was tried before Rea, J., and a verdict directed and rendered for defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
Upon the trial of this action the trial court directed the jury to return a verdict for the defendant. Upon this appeal we are to consider whether the case ought not to have been submitted to the jury. The defendant is the clerk of the district court for Hennepin county. This action against him is based upon substantially the same facts as were presented in Re Robbins, 36 Minn. 66, (30 N. W. Rep. 304.)
*544The defendant is sought to be made liable for his neglect to file or deposit the plaintiffs’ release of their insolvent debtor (Eobbins) in the proper place, with the other papers on file in his…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re RobbinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
3Cited by4 opinions
- Roerig v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Tholkes v. DecockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Prudential Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Whelan v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907