Legal Opinion

Marr v. Craddock

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 7, 1966No. 223PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNAGAN, Chief Justice.

This is a suit on an account. The appel-lee filed this suit in the nature of a sworn account and the appellant denied the account in toto under oath.

The appellee alleged in part that at the special instance and request of the appellant, founded on business dealings between the parties, he issued insurance policies and rendered services to appellant in the regular course of business on open account; that the appellant became bound to pay appellee on demand the sum of $281.94 and though often requested to do so, appellant had not paid said sum or any part thereof.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Renfro Drug Co. v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Jackson v. Hall, C.J.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Lanford v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  4. J. E. Earnest & Co. v. WordTexas Commission of Appeals · 1941
  5. J. E. Earnest & Co. v. WordTexas Supreme Court · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hercules Exploration, Inc. v. Halliburton Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983
  2. Blue Bell, Inc. v. IsbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Barcheers v. BraswellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Wilson v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. California Chemical Company v. SasserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API