Legal Opinion

Sackman v. Thomas

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1901No. 3813PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. Jesse P. Houser, Judge.

1Per curiam

One Daniel J. Sackman, prior to the year 1867, was living at Tracyton, in Kitsap county, Washington, with an Indian woman, and hy her he had children, among others the plaintiffs in this case. So far as the record shows, Daniel I. Sackman was never married before his marriage to Elizabeth W. Phillips. In July, 1864, said Sackman made a will, in which he acknowledged that the plaintiffs herein, naming them, were his children. This will does not appear to have been admitted to probate, but it was found among the papers of Daniel J. Sackman by his son Isaac shortly after Mr. Sack-man’s death,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chicago City v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  2. Lovejoy v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  3. United States v. DicksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  4. Holmes v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Hobart v. . HobartNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Sexton v. SextonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Pugsley v. SmythOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. People v. PalumboIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Ewing v. Van AlstineUtah Supreme Court · 1903
  5. State v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1905

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API