Best Motor and Implement Company, Inc. v. International Harvester Company
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge.
The question here is whether the Trial Court properly directed a verdict for the Manufacturer in the Dealer’s suit for damages flowing from an asserted illegal cancellation of dealership contracts and a trespass committed in the course of cancellation. The cancellation issue presents for possible application Louisiana’s “fair deal” dealership act 1 and the tres pass claim concerns a possible illegal repossession or possession of some trucks for a few days.
Best Motor & Implement Company, the Dealer, had a short, but not quiet, business life at Kentwood, Louisiana.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kuhl Motor Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- General Motors Corporation v. BlevinsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1956
- Buggs v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Willys Motors, Inc. v. Northwest Kaiser-Willys, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1956
- Grandeson v. International Harvester Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- B. T. Woodard and B. J. Woodard, D/B/A Woodard Motor Company v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- All West Pet Supply Co. v. Hill's Pet Products DivisionDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Augusta Rambler Sales, Inc. v. American Motors Sales Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1963
- AFL Motors, Inc. v. CHRYSLER MOTORS CORPORATIONDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1960
- Tupelo Spindle Co. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.