Kuhl Motor Co. v. Ford Motor Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The following facts are disclosed by the complaint. Plaintiff is a corporation located in the city of Milwaukee engaged in the business of selling and servicing motor vehicles. Defendant is a manufacturer of motor *490vehicles, parts, and accessories. On December 12, 1938, plaintiff and defendant entered into a written “Ford Sales Agreement,” which provided that it could be terminated at anytime at the will of either party by sixty days’ written notice. On April 17, 1954, plaintiff received from the defendant a notice of its intention to terminate the agreement (Exhibit E). Plaintiff alleges:
“6.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Zillmer v. KreutzbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Donnelly v. DeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- Huber v. MerkelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- In Re Estate of PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- In re Theresa Drainage DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by52 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
- Racine Harley-Davidson, Inc. v. State Division of Hearings & AppealsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- B. T. Woodard and B. J. Woodard, D/B/A Woodard Motor Company v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Layton School of Art & Design v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Forest Home Dodge, Inc. v. KarnsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.