Legal Opinion
Whirlpool Corporation v. Morse
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided June 13, 1963No. 3-62-Civ. 287PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LARSON, District Judge.
This matter came on for trial before the Court without a jury and was tried April 26 and April 29, 1963. Firestone, Fink, Krawetz, Miley and O’Neill, by Messrs. James P. Miley and Israel E. Krawetz, appeared on behalf of the plaintiff Whirlpool Corporation; Altman, Geraghty & Mullaly, by Mr. James Geraghty, appeared on behalf of the de-' fendant Morse Tuekpointing Co. The Court having heard the evidence and having considered the oral and written arguments of counsel, and being fully advised in the premises, now makes the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Weyerhaeuser Steamship Co. v. Nacirema Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Builders Supply Co. v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- McFall v. Compagnie Maritime Belge (Lloyd Royal) S. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Conover v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Associated Engineers, Inc. v. JobCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Keith Vagle v. Pickands Mather & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Olson v. Kilstofte and Vosejpka, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1971
- Becker v. Central Telephone and Utilities CorporationDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.