State v. Chervenell
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
These two consolidated cases are appeals from judgments of habitual offender status. In both proceedings, at least one of the convictions relied upon to establish habitual criminal status was based upon a guilty plea. In neither proceeding, however, did the State prove that the defendant, before pleading guilty, had been aware of his Fifth Amendment right not to testify against himself at trial. The issue thus presented is whether the State, *311when relying upon a conviction based upon a guilty plea to establish habitual criminal status, must show that the defendant was aware of this right. We…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Smith v. O'GRADYSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Donald Eugene Lambert v. James Blodgett, Donald Eugene Lambert v. James BlodgettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. VickersWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. VickersWashington Supreme Court · 2002
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.