Peeples v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Ruffin, Judge.
A jury found Spencer Peeples guilty of possessing cocaine and obstructing an officer. Peeples appeals from the judgment of conviction and the denial of his motion for new trial. We affirm.
1. Peeples asserts that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. We disagree. In our review of the trial court’s order denying Peeples’ motion to suppress, we construe the evidence most favorably to uphold the court’s ruling. Mao v. State, 222 Ga. App. 482, 483 (474 SE2d 679) (1996). It is the trial court’s duty to resolve conflicts in the evidence, and its findings of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Momon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Luallen v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Burrowes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Rooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Young v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- Buchanan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.