Legal Opinion

Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Eight

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 2, 1994No. 91-09579; CA A79871PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Employer seeks review of the Workers’ Compensation Board’s order holding that claimant’s occupational disease claim is compensable. We reverse and remand.

Claimant filed an occupational disease claim, which employer denied on July 26, 1991. Claimant sought a hearing, and the case went to hearing on October 17, 1991. When the hearing was convened, claimant requested a continuance to depose his treating physician, Dr. Bert. Claimant represented to the referee that it was not possible to provide the witness live and that the deposition could not be scheduled on fewer than six weeks’ notice.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bronson v. MoonenOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Harsh Investment Corp. v. State Ex Rel. State Housing DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aetna Cas. & Sur. v. SUE A. BLANTON, DCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. SAIF Corp. v. KurcinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Logsdon v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Logsdon v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API