Legal Opinion

Chambliss v. Buckner

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided March 29, 2011No. Case No. 3:10-CV-213-WKW [WO]PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1244 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

W. KEITH WATKINS, District Judge.

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Plaintiff Dexter A. Chambliss (“Chambliss”) alleges that five employees of the Alabama Department of Human Resources (“ADHR”) and its commissioner initiated and prosecuted a contempt petition against him to collect delinquent child support obligations from his Social Security Income benefits, in violation of the anti-attachment provision of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 407(a), 1383(d)(1). Mr. Chambliss seeks to recover monetary damages from Defendants in their individual capacities, who…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re LampartMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Juan Antonio Cannon v. William Danforth and Paul JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2026
  3. Owens v. ThorntonDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2025
  4. Santais v. Core Civic, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2021
  5. Smith v. The City of Dothan, AlabamaDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API