Legal Opinion
Winkle v. Tullos
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided March 7, 1996No. 14-93-00995-CVPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDELMAN, Justice.
In this medical malpractice case, Joy Winkle appeals from two judgments rendered in favor Hugh S. Tullos, M.D. on the grounds that (1) the claims relating to her first surgery were not barred by limitations, (2) the jury charge on limitations was erroneous, (3) the trial on limitations was improperly bifurcated, (4) the statutory provisions governing disclosure of medical risks and informed consent are unconstitutional, (5) the portions of the jury charge on informed consent and negligence were invalid, (6) the jury’s responses on lack of informed consent, negligence…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Trenholm v. RatcliffTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Texas Department of Human Services v. E.B.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Earle v. RatliffTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- C.M. Asfahl Agency v. Tensor Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
- Knoll v. Neblett, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
- Baylor University Medical Center v. Biggs, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
- Pierce v. Texas Racing Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.