Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Hartwig
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMAN, Justice.
The parties to this farm foreclosure action each claim the right to payments made by the government through the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP). See generally 16 U.S.C. §§ 3831-36 (1988). The district court decided that the payments constitute rent payable to the receiver within the meaning of the “rents and profits” clause of the mortgages and deed of trust executed by the parties. The mortgagors have appealed and we now affirm.
Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is the successor in interest to the Hayesville Savings Bank. Defendants Larry and Jill…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Equitable Life Insurance v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
- In Re WatersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 1988
- In Re RatliffUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1987
- Matter of ButzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Iowa · 1988
- Eastern Colorado Bank v. Harvie (In Re Harvie)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re ZweygardtDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992