Legal Opinion

Skoog v. Fredell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 20, 1983No. 68682PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

In Elliott v. Hiddleson, 303 N.W.2d 140, 144-45 (Iowa 1981), we abandoned the “stranger to the adoption rule,” and recognized a presumption that strangers to an adoption do not differentiate between natural and adopted children unless they manifest a contrary intent. The question here is whether such a contrary intent was manifested by a grantor who deeded property to his granddaughter for life, with remainder to “the heirs of her body.” The trial court held a contrary intent was manifested so that the adopted daughter of his granddaughter did not take a remainder interest. We…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pierson v. LaneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  2. First National Bank of Kansas City v. SullivanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  3. Elliott v. HiddlesonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  4. Buchan v. BuchanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  5. Pringle v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nichols v. City of EvansdaleSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  2. Hawkeye Land Co. v. Iowa Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 1993
  3. Matter of Estate of NicolausSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  4. Posey v. WebbMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  5. In the Matter of the Trust Under the Will of W.H. DaubendiekCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API