Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Hiddleson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 18, 1981No. 64584PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, Justice.

The question in this partition action concerns the right of an adopted child to take under the will of a stranger to the adoption. Applying the “stranger to the adoption” rule, the trial court held that plaintiff Judith Elliott was not a lineal heir of her adopting mother within the terms of her adoptive grandfather’s will. Because we reject the rule and the conclusion, we reverse and remand.

Plaintiff sought partition of 160 acres of Dallas County farmland in which she alleged an undivided one-eighth interest. Defendants are the seven natural grandchildren of S. B. Doidge.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Tafel EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Estate of HeardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Commerce Trust Company v. WeedSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  4. In Re the Estate of CoeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  5. Ford v. NewmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1979

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Marcia E. Roll v. Russell L. NewhallSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  2. Lehman v. Corpus Christi National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. First National Bank of Dubuque v. MacKeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  4. Matter of Estate of AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  5. In Re Nowels EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API