Legal Opinion

Hogan v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided August 3, 2021No. 4:21-cv-00078Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION JANE HOGAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4:21-CV-78 RLW ) WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, ) d/b/a WALMART, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Jane Hogan’s motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f) to strike 15 affirmative defenses raised by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (“Walmart”) in its answer. Walmart filed a response in opposition to the motion, to which Plaintiff filed a reply. The motion is fully ripe and ready for review. For the reasons that follow, the motion is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Stanbury Law Firm, P.A. v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  4. Bjc Health System v. Columbia Casualty Company, Atg Assurance Company Limited v. Columbia Casualty Company, Doing Business as Cna HealthproCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  5. Katherine A. Zotos v. Lindbergh School District O. Victor Lenz, Jr. Joseph A. SartoriusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API