Legal Opinion
In Re Ontario Locomotive & Industrial Railway Supplies (U.S.) Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York
Decided April 2, 1991No. 1-19-10023PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN W. CREAHAN, Bankruptcy Judge.
Presently before the Court is the motion of the United States of America, on behalf of the Department of the Navy (Navy), for relief from the automatic stay provisions of section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code. 11 U.S.C. § 362(a).
The relationship between the debtor, Ontario Locomotive and Industrial Railway Supplies (U.S.) Inc. (Ontario), and the Navy, had its genesis in the award of a contract by the Navy to Ontario. The contract, awarded September 13, 1988, called for the “remanufacture” of three Navy locomotives by Ontario. Many of the details of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & BildiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In Re Braniff Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- In the Matter of West Electronics Inc. Appeal of United States of America, by the United States Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- In Re Pioneer Ford Sales, Inc. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Matter of NoonanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States of America, Acting Through the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service v. Willis R. GerthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- John Cinicola v. William J. Scharffenberger, Chapter 11 Trustee, Et Al.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Matter of GP Express Airlines, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska · 1996
- Texaco Inc. v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Co.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1992
- In Re MoharUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.