Grier & Co. v. Hood
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal^fi-om,.the:,décíee off the.,Court of Common, Pleas,-off Armstrong-county The case is fully stated in the opinion of his- Honour, Mr. Jus tice Knox.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by.
Knox, J.
McCain &, Renshaw were partners -in: fhn.mer can tile-.-, business, and as such were indebted to Hood--& Co..for goods sold: and delivered; On the 19th of December,-1854, McCain executed; a bond in the name of McCain & Renshaw, for the amount of thee firm debt, to Hood & Co., with-power, of attorney-to-confess judgment. Upon this bond, judgment-was entered against McCain .&• Renshaw-in the Common Pleas-of Armstrong county-, on the-20th, of. December, 1854, and ■ execution issued and. delivered to the; sheriff on the 22d of-the sam.e-month.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wood's Administrator v. Wood's DeviseesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
- Wells & Spring v. EvansNew York Supreme Court · 1838
3Cited by8 opinions
- L. C. Jones Trucking Co. v. Superior Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1951
- Boyd v. Thompson & CoxeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Walsh v. KirbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- McCleery v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Evans v. WattsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.