Legal Opinion

Seattle-First National Bank v. Kawachi

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 13, 1978No. 4579-1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court dismissing an action for money due. The sole question presented is whether the court was correct in applying the doctrine of res judicata. We reverse.

On December 20, 1961, George Y. Kawachi received $15,000 from Hisashi Kato and his wife, Shizu Kato, for which he gave his promissory note. On February 21, 1962, Kawachi received $10,000 from the Katos to invest for them. This was evidenced by a written memorandum. In October 1970, Shizu Kato, individually and as executrix of her deceased husband's estate, brought an action against George…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sayward v. ThayerWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Meder v. CCME CORP.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  3. Savage v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Baxter v. Central West Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Donahoe v. PrattWashington Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Seattle-First National Bank v. KawachiWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Seattle-First National Bank v. KawachiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API