Legal Opinion

In Re the General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Big Horn River System

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 2003No. 02-239PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Justice.

[¶ 1] John Max Stutzman and Roberta Lee Stutzman, individual irrigators within the Shoshone Reclamation Project, claimed rights to use a proportionate share of the water stored in the Buffalo Bill Reservoir, which is owned and operated by the federal Bureau of Reclamation, and sought to have those rights adjudicated in the Big Horn River general adjudication. We hold the district court properly dismissed the Stutzmans’ claims as untimely.

ISSUES

[¶2] The Stutzmans present the following issues:

1. Whether the Petition for Intervention requests an adjudication of contract claims or…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Nevada v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Byerly v. MadsenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  3. Slavens v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Department of Revenue & Taxation v. IrvineWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Anderson v. Wyoming Development Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1944

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stutzman v. Office of the Wyoming State EngineerWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  2. William F. West Ranch, LLC v. TyrrellWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Osborn v. KiltsWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Wilson v. Lucerne Canal and Power Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Bird v. LampertWyoming Supreme Court · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API