Wilson v. Lucerne Canal and Power Co.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VOIGT, Chief Justice.
[T1] After a bench trial, the district court ruled in favor of Lucerne Canal and Power Company in a quiet title action that developed out of a festering easement dispute with Thomas L. Wilson and Helen L. Wilson. We affirm in part and reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings consistent herewith.
ISSUES
[12] 1. Are the Wilsons' claims barred by the doctrine of res judicata or by the doctrine of collateral estoppel?
2. Are the Wilsons' claims barred by the doctrine of judicial estoppel?
3. Did the district court err in refusing to quiet title to the property in the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Hopper v. All Pet Animal Clinic, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Willis v. WillisWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
- Matter of Paternity of JRWWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- Slavens v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- City of Gillette v. Hladky Const., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. TildenWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Tozzi v. MoffettWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- Helm v. ClarkWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Goodman v. VossWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.