Legal Opinion

In Re Riddlemoser

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 17, 1989No. 17, September Term, 1989PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Chief Judge.

We granted certiorari in this case upon a certification of issues of law from the Court of Special Appeals, pursuant to Maryland Rule 8-304. A threshold procedural issue is whether, if the appeal is now moot, we should nevertheless address the substantive issue in the case because of the urgency of establishing a rule of future conduct. The substantive issue presented is whether circuit courts possess authority to authorize a guardian to withhold life-sustaining medical treatment from a “disabled person” in the event of cardiac arrest.

I

Maryland Code (1974, 1988 Cum.Supp.),…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Lloyd v. Board of Supervisors of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Reyes v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Rasmussen by Mitchell v. FlemingArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. FickerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. In re Kaela C.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Mack v. MackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Maryland Commission on Human Relations v. Downey Communications, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  4. In Re Adoption/Guardianship No. 93321055/CADCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. In Re Kaela C.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API