Legal Opinion
Inre: Haase
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 30, 2013No. 2012-1690UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Richard Haase appeals from a decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (now the Patent Trial and Appeal Board) that sustained the Examiner’s final rejection of all claims in a patent application as not patentable over several prior-art references. We affirm.
Background
A
Mr. Haase filed Patent Application No. 10/413,849, entitled “Clarification of Water and Wastewater,” in April 2003. The application describes methods of clarifying waste water, or raw water, by removing solid contaminants that are suspended in the water. The first step is coagulation: chemical coagulants, mixed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Baxter International, Inc., and Baxter Healthcare Corporation v. McGaw Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Wyers v. Master Lock Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Ricoh Co., Ltd. v. Quanta Computer Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Titanium Metals Corporation of America v. Donald W. Banner, Commissioner of Patents and TrademarksCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Ben Venue Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Warner Chilcott Co. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Chemours Company Fc, LLC v. Daikin Industries, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Elbrus International Limited v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. C.R. Bard, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2015