Warner Chilcott Co. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
FINDING OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
HOCHBERG, District Judge:
This Opinion constitutes the Court’s findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52.
I. INTRODUCTION
Atelvia® — the osteoporosis drug covered by the challenged patents — purports to solve a problem experienced by patients who used earlier osteoporosis drugs: if ■the earlier drugs were taken with a meal, the active ingredient was captured by the calcium found in food molecules and was not absorbed into the body.1 When the medicine failed to enter the bloodstream, patients’ bones became…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Continental Can Company Usa, Inc. And Continental Pet Technologies, Inc. v. Monsanto Company, Hoover Universal, Inc. And Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tris Pharma, Inc. v. Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2017