Legal Opinion
Downie v. City of Middleburg Hts.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 30, 1999No. 1:98 CV 1396PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING THE MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT UNITED STATES AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS SIEGEL AND SCHNEIDER
WELLS, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on the substituted defendant United States’ motion to dismiss the Complaint against the United States and on defendants Siegel and Schneider’s motion to dismiss the remaining claims against them. The plaintiffs responded in opposition to both motions; the United States, Siegel, and Schneider filed reply memoranda. For the reasons that follow, the motion to dismiss…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mickey Downie David Wheat v. City of Middleburg Heights, Richard P. Siegel Thomas SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Limone v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Foster v. Walgreen Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 2014
- Martinek v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
- Adams v. Hamilton County Justice CenterDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.