Legal Opinion

United States v. Singhal

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 11, 2012No. Criminal No. 2011-0142PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.

Oh May 10, 2011, a grand jury returned a ten-count Indictment against defendants Shelly S. Singhal, Loretta Fredy Bush, and Dennis L. Pelino. The Indictment alleges that defendants engaged in a conspiracy and scheme to defraud the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), investors, and others through a series of undisclosed and disguised related party transactions and insider trading that generated proceeds exceeding $50 million. Indictment ¶ 1. The Indictment reads like a typical U.S. securities fraud case, yet it does not…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ge Dandong v. Pinnacle Performance Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  2. In re the Extradition of LiuksilaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  3. United States v. ApodacaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. BordaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. Capitol Breach Grand Jury Investigations Within the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API