Legal Opinion
Reginald Worthy v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 21, 2012No. 10-2441UnpublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Reginald Worthy appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant Michigan Bell Telephone Company, d/b/a AT&T Michigan, (“Michigan Bell”) on his claims of race discrimination and retaliation in violation of the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act (“ELCRA”), Mich. Comp. Laws § 37.2101, et seq. We affirm.
I
This court reviews a district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Parsons v. City of Pontiac, 533 F.3d 492, 499 (6th Cir.2008). Summary judgment is proper where “the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Alexander v. CareSourceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- William Tennial v. United Parcel Serv.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Monica Rogers v. Henry Ford Health Sys.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Lovelle Banks v. John Deere and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Doe v. Brown UniversityDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2016
- Sahm v. Miami UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.