Legal Opinion
Williams v. Denning
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 20, 1963No. 529PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CüRIAm.
Plaintiff took eleven exceptions1 — ten to the order ¡sustaining defendants’ motion to strike, one to the refusal to allow its motion for judgment ¡by default.
The exceptions are no|t grouped 'in the record as required by Rule 19(3) of the Court (254 N.C. 797). An order striking allegations contained in ¡a pleading is not appealable. The remedy, if tire order is deemed erroneous, isiby certiorari. Rule 4(a) (2) (254 N.C. 785).
Plaintiff’s pleadings are a complaint, G.S. 1-121, and a reply, G.S. 1-140. Defendants pleadings ¡are m answer and a demurrer, G.S. 1-124. A motion, is >an…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brownfield v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Osborne v. . Canton and Kinsland v. . MacKeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Osborne v. Town of CantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
3Cited by5 opinions
- O'Neill v. Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Funderburk v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Day v. CoffeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972