Paletsky v. Paletsky
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Dupont, C.P.J.
The sole issue presented by this appeal,1 as framed by the defendants,2 is whether title by adverse possession can be acquired where the claimant entered into possession under the mistaken belief that he owned the property. This was an action to quiet and settle title to a piece of land adjoining the plaintiffs home. The plaintiff alleged and the trial court found title by adverse possession.
*588The predecessor in title of both the plaintiff, Samuel Paletsky, and the defendant Bernard Paletsky was their father, Isidore Paletsky. Prior to 1949, the plaintiff’s father had conveyed two…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Clark v. DrskaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
- Ruick v. TwarkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Newell v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1862
- Searles v. DeladsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Loewenberg v. WallaceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- O'Connor v. LarocqueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Public Storage, Inc. v. Eliot Street Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Antero Resources Corporation v. Elwanda J. Pike, in her capacity as representative of the Estate of Rufus Fordyce Pike, John Kent Pike, Jr., Daniel Edward Pike, James P. Moffitt, Tanya L. Yoho, Ted Arthur McCullough, Robert A. Borchers, Ritchie Petroleum Corporation, AMP Fund III, LP, and Diversified Production LLC, successor in interest to Alliance Petroleum Co. LLC (Judge White, concurring in part and dissenting in part)Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia · 2025
- Charron v. Stoughton, No. 0050257 (Dec. 23, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992
- O'Connor v. LarocqueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011