Legal Opinion

Standard Implement Co. v. Schultz

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1890PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Saline District Court. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SiMPSON, C.:

The Standard Implement Company commenced an action in the district court of Saline county against the firm T. C. Ritter and Co., and attached their stock of hardware. Schultz & Hosea, who claimed to have a chat*53tel mortgage on the stock, interpleaded, and claimed that their chattel mortgage was a first lien. A trial was had on the in-terplea, and the court made the following findings of fact and of law:

“FINDINGS OF FACT.
“On January 3, 1887, and for several months prior thereto, the defendants, T. C. Ritter and his wife, P. J. Ritter, were engaged in the hardware business…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frankhouser v. EllettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  2. Gay v. BidwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Leser v. GlaserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Will T. Little Co. v. Burnham, Hanna, Munger & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  2. Joyce v. Armourdale State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  3. First National Bank of Smith Center v. HardmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Citizens State Bank v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  5. Brooks v. Bank of Beaver CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API