Legal Opinion

Will T. Little Co. v. Burnham, Hanna, Munger & Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 12, 1897PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from the District Court of Logan County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McAtee, J.:

This was an action in replevin in the district court of Logan county, brought by the defendants in error, plaintiffs below, against the plaintiffs in error, to recover possession of a stock of merchandise located in the city of Gruthrie, valued at $2,400.81, in which the plaintiffs claimed a special ownership in the property by virtue of a chattel mortgage, and caused a writ in re-plevin to issue, under which the sheriff of Logan county seized the goods in controversy, taking the same from the possession of the plaintiff in error, W. -T.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Robinson v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Cameron, Hull & Co. v. MarvinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  3. Blakeslee v. RossmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Means v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Nash v. NormentMissouri Court of Appeals · 1878

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Starr v. VaughnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Clark v. HuckabyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  3. Turk v. KramerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Whitener v. MossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Hoppe Hardware Co. v. BainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API