Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Hadlock
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1DissentWaller, Circuit Judge
I am unable to find any proof of negligence on the part of the Railroad in this case. All of the positive testimony on the subject of blowing the whistle and ringing the bell is to the effect that they were appropriately sounded. Against this is merely the negative testimony of Plaintiffs and one or two other witnesses that they did not hear any bell or whistle.
Not one of such witnesses who was in position to hear the bell or whistle had his attention directed thereto, and such testimony must give way to the positive testimony of those who did observe and hear.
In Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. MyrickSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
- Lowry v. Seaboard Airline R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. TimmonsSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
- Southern Railway Co. v. MannSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.