Legal Opinion

PennDOT v. Harrington

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County

Decided June 30, 1999No. 99-02476PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MacELREE, J.,

This case comes before me as a result of the suspension of defendant’s driver’s license. On May 6,1999,1 sustained defendant’s statutory appeal, and reinstated his driving privileges. The Commonwealth now appeals the ruling, complaining that our interpretation of 75 Pa.C.S. §1581, article III of the Driver’s License Compact and 75 Pa.C.S. § 1584 was unduly restrictive, was in violation of the mandates under the Driver’s License Compact, and beyond the limited scope of review of a bureau conviction-based suspension. We found the New Jersey notice to be deficient in that it lacked…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Hibben v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harrington v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Siekierda v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Crooks v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Crooks v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Harrington v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API