Legal Opinion

Crooks v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 2001No. 70 M.D. Appeal Docket 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

768 A.2d 1106 (2001)

Ryan T. CROOKS, Appellee

v.

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted August 31, 2000.

Decided April 11, 2001.

Harold H. Cramer, Andrew S. Gordon, Timothy P. Wile, Harrisburg, James M. Sheehan, Media, for appellant.

Dawson R. Muth, West Chester, Charles G. Nistico, Media, for Ryan T. Crooks.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ

OPINION

FLAHERTY, Chief Justice.

This is a direct appeal by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Com., Dept. of Transp. v. McCaffertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Harrington v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Petrovick v. COM., DEPT OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Petrovick v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API